Tag: disability

Accommodations and Advanced Classes

Posted on by Nicol Walsh

Great Information About Accommodations

There’s an unfortunate misunderstanding among some educators and disability professionals about accommodations and advanced classes (such as Magnet, Gifted, Advanced Placement, and/or Honors).  Schools have tried to tell students that accommodations can’t be used in advanced classes.  Some educators still labor under the impression that accommodations in some way “make it easier” for a student to do their work, and that they have no place in programs that are by definition selective, competitive, and/or academically challenging. In addition, students already in advanced classes whose parents believe they need an evaluation for special education have been told their child should return to the general education classroom.  “Obviously, Mary just can’t keep up”.

Even in the educational field some people still believe accommodations give students an unfair advantage. Accommodations are actually “work-arounds” to reduce the impact your child’s particular challenge has on his learning ability.  They’re designed to improve access to the learning process and certainly don’t guarantee academic success. Ask any child who has an accommodation-when it always takes you 60 minutes to read an assignment and your classmates take 30, being “given” the extra 30 minutes isn’t an advantage. It still takes you twice as long.

Modifications, another adjustment often found in IEPs and 504 plans, are different.  Modifications do change the curriculum and what’s expected from the student. As an example of the differences, look at a social studies test given to a fifth grade class. Tory’s test uses second-grade level language and concepts, and Tory’s test is a shorter length than the rest of his classmates’.  He has a modification. Jolene takes the regular test, but she sits in a “quiet study” carrel and takes a short break to refocus.  She has an accommodation. Children who use extensive modifications to the academic curriculum may not meet the academic criteria for advanced classes.

In 2007, the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) of the Department of Education published a letter giving school districts guidance on the subject of advanced classes and students with disability. Schools must give students with a disability the same opportunity to apply for admission into advanced classes as students without disability, and they can’t deny access to these programs based on a student’s having an IEP or 504 plan.  On the other hand, schools can set eligibility requirements for these classes, and a student with a disability must meet the same criteria as those without to qualify. Admission into advanced classes and programs are often determined by previous classroom performance or testing. It’s similar to trying out for a place on a team. Not everyone who tries out will make it, with or without a disability.

The same letter makes it clear that students receiving accommodations in their regular classes need to receive them in advanced classes as well.

What if your child is already in an advanced class and is struggling?  You suspect the reason isn’t that the material is too challenging, but that your son or daughter may have an as-yet-undefined challenge in accessing the material or with the way content is presented.  You worry that if you want an evaluation, the school will “suggest” (i.e., present as the only option) a return to the general education class.  The school can’t deny your request for an evaluation on the basis that a student is taking an academically-challenging class. Certainly your child can’t receive accommodations to “make sure” they succeed in a challenging environment. However there is a wide range of mental or physical conditions that could create a need for special education services. When your child is struggling, you want to know why, and while evaluations aren’t “fishing expeditions” they can be valuable tools to identify specific barriers your child may be facing.  Don’t hesitate to request one if you feel it needs to happen.

The United States Department of Education has just released a new memorandum clarifying, once again to school districts that “twice-exceptional” children (children who have high cognition and who also have a disability) also fall under the requirements of the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA), and are entitled to the same protection and services under the law as any other student with disability.  The memorandum references an earlier letter from 2013 discussing the same issue.

If your school department tells you that they won’t evaluate your child because they have high cognition or refuses to let them use modifications in either advanced or general education classes (because they “have high cognition and shouldn’t need extra help”), then you might wish to draw their attention to both the original letter and the memorandum.  Both of these Department of Education documents were distributed to state superintendents of education and should have been forwarded to local school departments.

In summary: bright, creative and resourceful children can have challenges that can be worked around with proper accommodations. Schools are obligated to provide accommodations in advanced classes if the child has them in an IEP or 504 plan. Children already in advanced classes are also entitled to evaluation for special education services if a parent requests one.

Thanks to DisabilityScoop.com for their article on this topic!

Positive Behavior Supports: Continuing the model at home and in the community

Posted on by Nicol Walsh

By: Dr. Vanessa Tucker, PhD., BCBA-D

What is Positive Behavior Support?

Positive Behavior Support (PBS) is a special education initiative that informs school districts, schools and classrooms regarding prevention and intervention practices designed to teach and reinforce pro-social behaviors. Behavior supports, as we parents well know, do not end at the schoolhouse door. Interfering behaviors can and do continue to manifest themselves in other settings and present a real and present challenge to parents and caregivers raising children with special needs.

The field of PBS is built on the premise of universal interventions that are designed to teach behaviors that prevent negative or challenging ones from occurring. These universal interventions, or Tier I, are effective for most children, but approximately 15 to 20% will need something much more intense in order to experience success. These children require what are known as Tier II and Tier III Interventions. Tier II interventions are designed to address the 15% who need more focused interventions. These may be temporary or may be needed on an ongoing basis. A small number of children (approximately 5%) will require intensive interventions, or Tier III, designed to support the most challenging behaviors. As a parent, you may find that problematic behaviors are a top priority for you due to your child’s unique needs. Parents can benefit from applying the same basic system of PBS in the home and community in order to mitigate the presence of interfering behaviors as well as teaching and reinforcing acceptable replacements. The focus of this brief article will be on prevention tactics that parents and caregivers can implement in the home and community.

Prevention as Intervention

Challenging or interfering behaviors occur for a wide variety of reasons. In many cases a communication breakdown is the “culprit.” In other words, children who have communication delays often resort to behaviors we don’t want in order to let us know what they do want! Children may also engage in challenging behavior due to stress, fatigue, unmet needs for attention, or because they have learned a habit that “works” for them. For example, the child may engage in mild to moderate aggression toward a parent when they first arrive at home as a means of accessing attention. This is problematic as the child inevitably is reinforced for these behaviors when the parent provides the designed attention. The first order of business in PBS is to teach and reinforce behaviors and/or to change our own practices as a means of prevention. In addition, it is strongly recommended that you work with your school team and utilize the Functional Behavior Assessment (FBA) and Positive Behavior Intervention Plan (PBIP) to guide your interventions at home. Pay close attention to the described “function” or reason(s) why your child engages in challenging behaviors. You’ll want to plan your interventions based upon those hypothesized functions. For example, if your child’s aggression is due to escape from unwanted tasks, you’ll want to find ways to help him escape (e.g. ask for a break) successfully. Remember that whatever you select as an intervention should be acceptable to you and your family.

In order to be efficient, you will want to analyze the various times, areas and places where challenging behaviors are most likely to occur. Create a simple matrix of your activities and rate your child’s behaviors as (a) non-problematic, (b) somewhat problematic, or (c) very problematic. Target those areas that are “very problematic” first. Decide what could be creating or maintaining the problematic behavior. Is your child in need of communication supports? Does he understand what is expected of him? Does she need more visuals in order to do what you want? Is her need for attention being met in ways that are unacceptable? Are there sibling issues? Tackling the most difficult areas first will bolster your ability to dive into the smaller issues later and may actually address them inadvertently through your interventions with the bigger ones.

The following table (Table 1.0) presents a list of general recommendations and justifications for prevention of challenging behaviors at home or in the community.

Table 1.0 Tactics for Prevention of Challenging Behaviors

Tactic Rationale Example
Non-Contingent Reinforcement/Planned Attention Your child may need your attention and will engage in whatever behavior necessary to obtain it. You want your child to obtain your attention without having to engage in mild to moderate behaviors to receive it. When you come home spend the first 10 or so minutes with your child before you check email, answer the phone or do anything else. Plan this and stick with it. Give your child (or children) your undivided attention before you do anything else.
Schedules-Visuals and/or Written Your child may need the same structural supports that they use in the school setting in order to predict what is coming, what is done, and what is expected of them. They may not be able to predict these things as successfully if given with verbal prompts only. Create and use schedules with visuals or words for family routines. This might include an activity schedule for evening activities, for a bathing routine or a trip to the store. Rely on your school staff for support in this area. They can assist you to build and use these systems.
Transition Schedules and Objects Your child may need more information than you require in order to successfully understand and navigate transitions. You may need to provide him with more information about what is coming and what will happen. Challenging behaviors may result from a breakdown in understanding what is coming or what is expected. Create a transition schedule such as a white board with icons and/or line drawings. Some children benefit from a basic checklist that they can “check off” as they go. Others need a transition object (e.g. a teddy bear, or something else that is comforting) in order to successfully navigate transitions.
Demand-free time after school All children are tired to some degree or another after school. For some children, the social demands of school have left them with very little in the “tank” at the end of the day. Behaviors may occur because the child needs rest from social and other demands. Consider providing 30 minutes or more of demand-free time (e.g. no homework) after school. Pair this with a timer and allow the child to engage in something that is soothing, restful and relaxing. Don’t pair this with their favorite and most reinforcing activity-save that for after they complete what you want later in the evening, especially if that involves homework or chores. Engage them in a schedule with demands (homework and chores, etc.) after a period of rest.
Homework and Chores A child may balk at the idea of homework and/or chores, which are regular expectations of most parents after school. You may find that children engage in a lot of challenging behavior around these two areas. Consider the rest time after school as the first line of defense. Then, consider using a visual system that breaks down what they have to do, how long they have to do it, and when they are finished. Break things into smaller pieces (called “chunking”) and consider pairing with breaks in between each piece. Show visuals of what you expect the finished product to be. For example, what does a clean bathroom look like? Show each part in a picture format.
Token System Your child may not be particularly motivated to engage in things that are outside of his/her interest area. Challenging behaviors may occur despite your efforts to provide visual structure and break things into smaller pieces. She may need a more tangible way to motivate her to comply with what you want. Consider adding in a token system designed to provide reinforcement for desired behaviors. If possible, mirror the ones used at school if they are effective in motivating the child to comply. Creating a “First, then” procedure allows the child to see that after they do what you want, they will get something that they want. For example, “first clean bathroom, then 20 minutes of iPad” is a reasonable expectation. Provide tokens (stickers on a chart, poker chips on a velcro board) for each step of the bathroom clean up. Make sure you follow through with the earned reinforcer once they’ve complied.

Summary

Challenging behaviors in the home and community are never easy for parents or caregivers to address. Working with your school team, you can come up with ways to support your child so that they understand what you want and have the tools to engage in replacement behaviors that are acceptable to everyone. Many children with disabilities benefit from the same basic principles of PBS that are used in schools. A focus on prevention can decrease stress, increase compliance and teach replacements that lead to better behavior in all settings.

Does my child qualify for Assistive Technology (AT) in school?

Posted on by Nicol Walsh

If your child is eligible for special education or Section 504 accommodations, then the answer is “yes” if the assistive technology (AT) is necessary to achieve a “free and appropriate public education”.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, (IDEA), states “The Individualized Education Program, (IEP), team shall consider whether the child requires assistive technology devices and services”.  The Washington State regulation (WAC 392-172A-02015) similarly states “each school district shall ensure that assistive technology devices or assistive technology services or both are made available to a student eligible for special education if required as part of the student’s: (a) Special education; (b) Related services; or (c) Supplementary aids and services.”  These are strong mandates to use in advocating for inclusion of assistive technology in your child’s IEP.

What Kinds of Devices Do Schools Have to Provide?   Both the State and Federal special education laws define assistive technology broadly to include a range of devices (from “off the shelf” to customize) and services.  The inclusion of “services” is very important. Such services can include evaluation and training for both school staff and family members.  Such training is often the key to successful use of the assistive technology.  Some examples of AT could be:  word processors, electronic communication devices, computers and printers, calculators, speech recognition software, print enlargement, text reading equipment, wheelchairs, electric scooters, etc.

How Do I Know What Kind of AT My Child Needs?  Get an evaluation from a competent professional.  If your school district does not have a staff person knowledgeable about AT, ask for an independent evaluation from the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction at the Special Education Technical Center or from another experienced AT evaluator.  There are many devices available.  Be open-minded.  There may be more than one appropriate solution for your child’s needs.  The most expensive device may not be the best match for your child. Such devices could be complicated and frustrating for the child, resulting in a total turn-off from technology.  Try different types with the child to determine which meets the child’s needs appropriately. The device can be brought home if it is necessary to achieve a free and appropriate education as for example, when the child needs the device at home for homework and/or additional and supplementary training.

Does the School Have to Pay for Any Device – No Matter How Expensive?  Not necessarily, the school is not required to buy the most expensive assistive technology if a more moderately priced device will work to achieve a free and appropriate education.  The school’s obligation is to “provide” assistive technology from their own inventory or an outside source and it cannot ask you to contribute.  If the device is paid for by the school district, the district maintains ownership of it.

What Will Happen to the Child’s AT When the Child Graduates or Leaves the District for Another Reason?  Because the district owns the equipment, the district keeps it unless you can convince the district to sell it to you, or the next program, at its depreciated value.  Planning for your child’s transition to post-secondary education, training, or directly to work is also a critical part of the process. Deciding future AT needs prior to that transition is critical. To help ensure a successful transition after high school, planning must begin by at least 16 years of age.

This may include information on State or Federal laws regarding the rights of individuals with disabilities. While this is provided to inform or make one aware of these rights, legal definitions, or laws/regulations, it is not providing legal representation or legal advice. The participant understands that this is information to educate them not to provide them with legal representation

Person Centered Planning and Aging Families

Posted on by Nicol Walsh

At the age of 56, a single parent from the baby boom age, my youngest son is now 26, and at this time in my life I need to plan for my retirement.

In a few years I will be heading toward the twilight of my life, so I need to take into account how that affects the life of my son, Kyle, who experiences Down Syndrome. Just like many families who live with and care for their adult sons and daughters for most of their life, it is my responsibility to share vital information that I might be the only one who knows, such as how, what, when, and where services are to be received. This way all the hard planning that has made his routine and the quality of life possible can continue even when I’m no longer able to care for him or myself as I age.

Up to this point most families don’t plan for such events, thinking that they will outlive their loved one with a developmental disability, brushing aside thoughts of what the future might hold for them. If I don’t think about it won’t happen. So usually what happens is when the parent or care giver has a medical emergency there is no plan of care or support for themselves or for their adult son or daughter with a disability, leaving both in need of a plan of care. It will be important to identify who it is left to sort through the maze of services, or lack of services, to help during this very vulnerable time.

Person Centered Planning is a tool that is used to help people plan for the future. Just as you plan along awaited trip you use a simple guide to help you make the journey comfortable to enjoy your precious time you have set aside. When it is time to plan, bring together the people who will be in the family’s life at that critical time. Usually, it is left up to siblings who have not been very involved in their sibling’s day-to-day care. Their parents did a really good job of caring for their sibling, but most find out the hard way what the daily routine looks like for their sibling.

By using the Person Centered Planning method, you have a document on hand so that you are able to have input into a plan of care before a crises.

Aging parents must start thinking about drafting a will and learning about trusts for your peace of mind. Think about the use of Person Centered Planning as a tool, as it can help relay your wishes and concerns. Share information about their care, like who their doctors are, what their care plan is, and other things like a living will. This is in case the parent loses their ability to share vital information to the people who care and to service providers who need to plan action steps.  What history of care has been provided, what are the needs, who can help, what is the plan of care when you or I are not able to communicate the needs of our adult sons and daughters?  As we age, the plan becomes the family plan, not just for the individual but for the whole family, including the network of support and those who will be left to sort things out.

The process helps pull together all their important information so that people who come in and out of the person’s life have something with which to help plan a positive quietly of life for the  individual and their family.

Pierce County Parent to Parent has also put together a care notebook that helps families keep important information together for when the parent is no longer able to speak for themselves or share information that is important, not just for the individual with the disability, but for the family itself.

Learn more about Person Centered Planning

Reunited photo courtesy Jenn Durfey via flickr

Universal Design for Learning

Posted on by Nicol Walsh

What is Universal Design for Learning (UDL)?

Currently, the focus of education is to prepare all students to be experts in their chosen fields of study, turning the early learner into a lifelong learner building on individual needs and strengths to accomplish this goal.  Universal Design for Learning (UDL) helps educators by providing academically structured framework on which to create curricula that meets the varied needs of all learners.   With a guidance to curriculum formation and implementation, greater variety of instruction methods can occur to engage and motivate students to learn.  Educators have more freedom in instructing students when the typical methods did not provide optimal educational experiences.

The UDL Guidelines are organized by 3 guiding principles:

Principle 1: Multiple Means of Representation

Provide options for perception, language and symbols, and comprehension.

Principle 2: Multiple Means of Expression

Provide options for physical action, expressive skills and fluency, and executive functions.

Principle 3: Multiple Means of Engagement

Provide options for recruiting interest, effort and persistence, and self-regulation.

Each area has built in checkpoints moving away from the one-size-fits-all mindset to providing optimal teaching experiences through auditory, visual, and hands-on practical suggestions.  Checkpoints also provide guidance on accessing materials, assessments, enhancing value of learned material, expanding coping skills, as well as reflection on the work done.  UDL includes evidence-based resources and examples to guide implementation, ensuring that what is taught and how it is presented will have an impact on the students.  Teachers can benefit from UDL as it provides guidance on organization of the classroom and curriculum, reducing distractions, increased use of technology to enhance learning, and how to educate students with disabilities.

 

Guiding Principles that propel the development of UDL are:

Principle 1: Equitable use—The purpose is ensure the design is useful and marketable to diverse students, including those with disabilities.  Providing equal access is not enough, teaching students of all abilities and propelling them to excellence must be the goal of education.

Principle 2: Flexibility in use—The curriculum’s design must accommodate the wide range of abilities and preferences.  Disabled students, fast or slow learners, can all benefit as the range of education will match the abilities of each individual. Students can learn how they need to learn.

Principle 3: Simple and intuitive use—Curriculum should be easily understood regardless of the user’s experience, knowledge, language skills, or current concentration level.  Education should be easy with clear guidelines, steps, and protocols.  By removing the guesswork out of teaching, time can be saved because all the steps are included and a solid academic foundation is built from the beginning so that all students can excel.

Principle 4: Perceptible information—Information is effectively communicated to the learner, regardless of the student’s needs, challenges or disabilities.  This can provide comfort to families knowing that students that learn differently will have access to the curriculum provided to the student in ways that use their strengths to learn.

Principle 5: Tolerance for error—The design minimizes hazards and the adverse consequences of accidental or unintended actions.

Principle 6: Low physical effort—Curriculum should be designed so that it is efficient and comfortable without being tiring for the student, parents, and educators.

Principle 7: Size and space for approach and use—The focus of the design will not limit the size and space necessary for the students to learn, but will be accessible for all individuals, including those with body size, posture, or mobility concerns.  This assurance provides solutions for approach, reach, manipulation, and use in order to enhance the educational experience.  Access to everything will be available and provided for all individuals, which should eliminate discrimination concerns.

Information adapted from: Principles of Universal Design, version 2.0 (Center for Universal Design, North Carolina, 1997)

UDL provides excitement and hope for parents and educators that have struggled with students that are atypical learners.  The one-size-fits-all approach to education does not work for all students.  With the ability to adapt an inflexible curriculum, all elements are adapted for any student that may learn differently, requires real life examples, hands on experiences, or who needs more reinforcement to understand concepts.

With the curriculum intentionally written to be all inclusive, a better learning environment can be implemented, as stresses of last minute adaptions are eliminated.  The evidence-based adaptions are planned from the start and incorporated in to daily teaching for all learners.  The UDL will not take the place of the IEP or the 504 Plans, but will aid in the implementation of accommodations and modifications.

Educating disabled students with their peers can be promoted with the adoption of UDL standards because it allows for multiple levels of teaching and learning of the same subject in the same classroom.  UDL standards will not replace resources or other specialized education classrooms, but will enhance the teaching done in the alternative environments when placement away from the general education classroom is required by the IEP.

Students, parents, and educators will benefit by UDL.  Students will be prepared for the future by learning how they learn best, becoming academic experts as they prepare for college or work life. Parents can take comfort in knowing that all children will be provided access to education in the ways necessary for each student to learn.  This can be especially comforting for those parents who have students that learn differently.

As educators work to improve their curriculum, their teaching skills will be strengthened and the adaptation of curriculum will be done in advance, saving preparation time.  Educators will also gain confidence when teaching students with varying skills, abilities, and learning levels; making them experts at teaching a variety of individuals.

“Working Together with Military Families of Individuals with DisAbilities!”

 

The school wants to use Aversive Intervention, what do I do?

Posted on by Nicol Walsh

What is aversive intervention?

Washington Administrative Code (WAC) Section 392-172A-03120 sets out the following:

Aversive interventions means the systematic use of stimuli or other treatment which a student is known to find unpleasant for the purpose of discouraging undesirable behavior on the part of the student. The term does not include the use of reasonable force, restraint, or other treatment to control unpredicted spontaneous behavior which poses one of the following dangers:

(a) A clear and present danger of serious harm to the student or another person.

(b) A clear and present danger of serious harm to property.

(c) A clear and present danger of seriously disrupting the educational process.

This WAC section also states that “aversive interventions, to the extent permitted, shall only be used as a last resort. Positive behavioral supports interventions shall be used by the school district and described in the indivi-dualized education program prior to the determination that the use of aversive intervention is a necessary part of the student’s program.” More simply put, using an aversive intervention plan must be a last resort measure and positive behavioral supports interventions must be used and described in the IEP prior to determining that aversive intervention is a necessary part of the student’s program.

Requirements for Implementing Aversive Interventions

If an IEP team is considering the use of an aversive intervention because positive behavior support interventions have not worked in discouraging undesirable behavior on the part of the student, the team must follow WAC 392-172A-03135.  (http://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac/default.aspx?cite=392-172A-03135)

What do I need to know?

All students with Aversive Plans MUST have Behavior Intervention Plans as part of their IEP that have all of the above elements. Again, “aversive interventions” means the systematic use of stimuli or other treatment which a student is known to find unpleasant for the purpose of discouraging undesirable behavior on the part of the student. As such, Aversive Plans should not be focused on responding to unpredicted spontaneous behavior and should instead be focused on why the team believes an aversive measure is an appropriate tool to use to help a student meet a specific behavior objective and how the tool will be used.

Requirements for Monitoring Aversive Interventions

As set forth above, WAC 392-172A-03135(1)(h) requires that at least every three months when school is in session, the effect of the use of aversive interventions be reviewed. Each case manager insures that data is collected regarding the use of aversive interventions for this periodic review for each student on their caseload on the following schedule:

Preschool and elementary: with trimester progress reporting

Secondary: by 12/1, 2/1, 5/1

If changes need to be made to the current aversive intervention plan, those must be done through an IEP amendment, complete with all required paperwork. If no changes are necessary then the case manager completes a prior written notice documenting this review that is sent to parents and central files for the legal file.

The PAVE Parent Training and Information Program may include information on State or Federal laws regarding the rights of individuals with disabilities. While this is provided to inform or make one aware of these rights, legal definitions, or laws/regulations, it is not providing legal representation or legal advice. The recipient understands that this is information is to educate them not to provide them with legal representation.